The social contract that led to the codification of present day laws,may be the direct reason why some urge,whether we have the autonomy to control our own lives.Or conversely,do society impose what is socially acceptable.
We did not all ratify the laws and norms of the society we live in but are bound to morally behave in a socially acceptable way.I read an article three days ago in the Daily mail,about Simon Cowell's extravagant 50th birthday bash.Of course,all those who attended - under my assumption, would have been on the guest list and Max Mosley the F1 boss was one of them.
The author of the article wrote:
Despite the fact that guests of honour included the host's 84-year-old mother and a local vicar, the party's entertainment included exotic topless dancers, naked women gyrating behind a big screen, and a guest enjoying a good whipping on stage from a dominatrix.
But the highlight of the show was the appearance on stage of a giant replica of female genitalia, joined by two giant sex toys. What a jolly jape to humiliate every woman in the audience.
I'm only surprised disgraced Formula One boss Max Mosley wasn't there doing a turn.
As Journos,how far can we then go in naming a man who won a liable case against a newspaper publisher before?To what extent will the author and publisher justify that this is a fair comment?Can there be a legal writ against the paper,if Max Mosley decides to sue for defamation.
Or are we continuing to walk on quick sand again?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment